Home
About
About Rowan,
Part of Clarivate
Team
News
Diversity
Careers
Software
Invention Management
Patent Drafting
Review
Patent Prosecution
Videos
Rowan Patents Overview Video
Drawing Tool Overview Video
Drafting Demo Video
Adding, Managing, and Using Terms with Rowan Patents Drafting Video
Rowan Terms Manager Video
Rowan Patents for Chemistry
Articles & Insights
Customer Success Stories
Nathan Whitlock
Sheema Khan
Jennifer Lane Spaith
Kimani Clark
Tom Otterlee
Kyle Yarberry
Articles
Understanding AI-assisted patent drafting
What Should ChatGPT’s Role in Drafting Patent Applications Be?
It’s Not Just About the Product
Will Attorneys Who Use ChatGPT Replace Attorneys Who Don’t?
Omnibus Patents with Rowan
What is an Integrated Drafting Environment?
Rowan Launches Latest Rowan Patents Software Driving More Effective Patent Prosecution
Polsinelli and Rowan TELS Form Strategic Partnership
Choosing Patent Drafting Software
Why Does A Single Platform For Developing a Patent Application Matter?
Using Rowan Analytics to Help Connect the Dots
The Future of Patent Drafting
Why Would a Company Want to Provide Patent Drafting Software to Their Outside Counsel?
Rowan Patents Updated for the Life Sciences Industry
Rowan Analytics Insights
Rowan Analytics Insights Jan 24
Rowan Analytics Insights Feb 24
Rowan Analytics Insights Mar 24
2021-2023 Benchmarking Report Archive
News
Rowan Patents Releases New Tools
Rowan Releases AI Assistants
Clarivate Acquires Rowan TELS to Enhance Support for Patent Practitioners
Rowan TELS Partners with Quartz IP
Rowan and Polsinelli Named to 2023 Legal Technology Trailblazers List
All News
Client Support
Overview
Preparation User Manuals
Online Documentation
Support and How-To Articles
Importing Large Molecule Sequences from a FASTA/FASTQ file
Webinars
Contact
Request More Info
Pilot Program
Other Inquiries
See It in Action
Menu
Menu
Rowan Analytics Insights
Patent Prosecution Analytics Benchmarking Report Archive
2023
January 2023: Patent Preparation and Prosecution Survey
March 2023: Customer Survey: The Use of Patent Drafting Software
April 2023: Comparison of Technology Centers Utilized in 2011 and 2021
May 2023: Changes In Technology Centers 1600 and 1700 between 2011 and 2021
June 2023: Changes in Technology Centers 2100 and 2400 Between 2011 and 2021
July 2023: Changes in Technology Centers 2600 and 2800 Between 2011 and 2021
August 2023: Examining 101 Rejections in Office Actions by Technology Center
October 2023: Examining 102 Rejections in Office Actions by Technology Center
November 2023: Examining 103 Rejections in Office Actions by Technology Center
2022
January 2022: Top Ten Law Firm Data – by Tech Center
February 2022: Rejection Rates for Top Filing Law Firms in High Tech Sectors
March 2022: Rejection Rates for Top Filing Law Firms in Biotechnology / Organic
April 2022: Rejection Rates for Top Filing Law Firms in Chemical Sector
May 2022: Analyzing CBM Petitions with 112 Arguments
June 2022: Examination of Rejection Types in CBM Petitions
July 2022: Examination of 112 Rejections in CBM Petitions
August 2022: Examination of 112 Rejections in PGR Petitions
September 2022: Comparison of CBM and PGR Petitions
October 2022: iFIT v. Peloton: Could Patent Drafting Software Have Altered the Outcome of an IP Dispute?
November 2022: Office Action Comparisons
December 2022: A cup of coffee for your thoughts?
2021
May 2021: Introduction
June 2021: Analyzing Entity Size and Patent Rejection Grounds
July 2021: Analyzing 112 Rejections Based on Total Office Actions
August 2021: Analyzing 112 Rejections By Technology Center
September 2021: Analyzing 112 Rejections Received by Three Top Filers
October 2021: Analyzing 112 Rejections Received by Top Filers in 1600 Technology Center
November 2021: Analyzing 112 Rejections Received by Top Filers in 1700 Technology Center
December 2021: Top Ten Law Firm Data
Scroll to top